What is wrong with Prop 1&3
Text Box: Prop 1 was coined to be the cross interest support or compromise proposal between the hard line environmentalist and fisherman. In very few regions was this the case. In PV it certainly was not a viable alternative PV prop 1 does not meet feasibility nor offer protection to indigenous fish species   the document can also be downloaded at  ppt here http://www.keeprockypointopen.com/Poor%20feasibility%20of%20palos%20verdes%20proposal%201%20for%20BRTF.ppt  PDF here http://www.keeprockypointopen.com/Poor%20feasibility%20of%20palos%20verdes%20proposal%20brtf%20.pdf Proposal 2 rationale, feasibility and cross interest support are discussed in this PPT which can also be viewed here http://www.keeprockypointopen.com/PV%20proposal%202%20the%20best%20for%20everyone.ppt   the Terranea Resort is located at the center of the PV MPA proposal 2 complex This resort could possibly become the central focal point of the best SMR/SMCA in the southern california study region.  Just offshore of this property is an area that has been identified as containing the highest degree of biodiversity in all of palos verdes and the only true south facing rocky point along the coastal study region.   The terrenea Resort has made a profound commitment to preserving and restoring the environment and promoting stewardship. Their efforts can be found on the web at http://www.terranea.com/destination-earth.php Proposal 3 will have a devastating effect on the south bay here is a Power Point illustrating how the Eco-trust data grossly under estimates the impact of proposal 3 to user groups in redondo beach   the PPT can also be downloaded here http://www.keeprockypointopen.com/Economic%20impact%20of%20PV%20proposal%203%20is%20disproportionately.ppt   can be viewed as a PDF here http://www.keeprockypointopen.com/Economic%20impact%20of%20PV%20proposal%203%20is%20dispropo.pdf